[CIG-LONG] cig-long email list

[Garrett Ito]

Hey Steve,
 
  Glad to hear that you're back!  From a practical point of view, I'm less concerned as to whether SNAC and Gale are solving the exact same problem, just that they "adequately" resolve faults and produce the "similar" faulting patterns (e.g., variable grid size is fair game. Eunseo--Did this get carried over to SNAC?).  From a computational point of view, eventually it would be nice to benchmark the codes on an identical problem (or two or three).
 
The last input file that I sent to Walter is the right one--did you get the attachment?  It would be great to toss Underworld with its unique muscle into the mix.   Is this a can do?
 
Garrett

----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Quenette <steve at vpac.org>
Date: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:19 pm
Subject: Re: [CIG-LONG] cig-long email list
To: Eunseo Choi <echoi at ldeo.columbia.edu>
Cc: Garrett Ito <gito at hawaii.edu>, cig-long at geodynamics.org

> 
> Hi all,
> 
> 
> Fantastic conversation... makes me wish I didn't go on holidays:)
> 
> To clarify, and I may have mis-read the thread, the plan is to 
> run GALE
> and SNAC for the same mesh size (and then vary processors, 
> etc)... are
> you solving the same problem if you do this? (I realise your 
> solving to
> the same elapsed time)
> 
> 
> Steve.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Steve Quenette
> VPAC, http://www.vpac.org
>   Manager - Health & Computational Software Development
>   Co-Director AuScope Simulation & Modelling Victoria
> (m) +61 438 558 275, (w) +61 3 9348 1100, (f) +61 9925 4647
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://geodynamics.org/pipermail/cig-long/attachments/20090513/c3fc9754/attachment-0001.htm